Oil Tankers Are Being Attacked and Brent Is Near $97. So Why Isn’t Gold Rising?

Posted by GoldRates

The conflict around the Strait of Hormuz has escalated into direct attacks on oil-carrying vessels, pushing crude prices higher and reducing shipping traffic. Yet gold has fallen below $4,410. The apparent contradiction shows why geopolitical risk does not always translate into higher gold prices.

 

 

The Strait of Hormuz is becoming more dangerous, oil prices are rising again, and commercial tankers are increasingly caught in the confrontation between the United States and Iran.

 

Under ordinary circumstances, that combination might be expected to send investors toward gold. Instead, bullion moved lower on Monday.

 

Spot gold fell 0.6% to about $4,402.86 per troy ounce in early trading on September 7, according to Reuters. U.S. gold futures were down about 0.5% at $4,447.60. Silver also slipped, falling to around $65.80 per ounce.

 

At the same time, Brent crude climbed above $97 a barrel as the conflict moved deeper into the physical oil market. Reuters reported that Brent reached $97.07 while U.S. West Texas Intermediate rose to $92.28.

 

The question for gold is therefore unusually clear: if geopolitical risk is escalating, why is the traditional safe-haven asset falling?

 

 

The conflict is now directly involving oil tankers

 

The latest escalation is significant because the confrontation is no longer confined to military installations and warships. The conflict is now directly targeting oil-carrying vessels.

 

Over the weekend, U.S. forces struck three Iranian crude carriers after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched ballistic missiles at two U.S. Navy ships, according to U.S. Central Command. Iran, meanwhile, said it targeted tankers travelling on routes it considered unauthorised as well as U.S. vessels.

 

U.S. officials reported no injuries among American personnel, but the episode marked another step toward the commercial shipping system becoming part of the conflict.

 

Maritime intelligence firm Marisks described the development as a significant escalation because commercial tankers are increasingly being used as instruments of economic pressure.

 

That matters far beyond the ships involved. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important energy corridors, and disruptions there can affect the availability and cost of crude oil and refined fuels across global markets.

 

 

Hormuz traffic has fallen sharply

 

Shipping data show that the risk is already changing behaviour.

 

The average number of commodity vessels crossing the Strait during the latest 10-day period has fallen to about 10 per day, the lowest level since May, according to Kpler data cited by Reuters.

 

Traffic dropped from more than 15 commodity ships on Friday to just two on Saturday. On Sunday, four laden commodity vessels entered the Strait, but Reuters reported that a Saudi Arabian tanker attempting to leave was turned back. No very large crude carriers had exited since Wednesday at the time of the report.

 

Iran has also announced plans for a restricted zone near the Strait, adding another layer of uncertainty for shipowners, insurers and commodity traders.

 

The immediate result is an increasingly visible risk premium in oil. Brent gained 7.6% last week and WTI rose about 10%, before both extended their gains on Monday.

 

 

Normally, this should help gold

 

Gold has a long-established reputation as a defensive asset during periods of political, military and financial uncertainty.

 

War can increase demand for assets perceived as stores of value, particularly when investors worry about currencies, financial stability or the security of conventional assets.

 

That relationship is one reason geopolitical headlines can sometimes produce an immediate jump in bullion prices.

 

But the relationship is not automatic. Many other forces also influence gold. These include interest rates, bond yields, the U.S. dollar, inflation expectations, investment flows and central-bank demand.

 

That is exactly what appears to be happening now.

 

 

The same war that supports safe-haven demand is raising inflation risk

 

The problem for gold is that the conflict is increasingly an energy shock as well as a geopolitical shock.

 

When oil becomes more expensive, fuel, transportation, manufacturing and distribution costs can rise across the economy. If those increases persist, they can slow or reverse progress on inflation.

 

The effect is particularly important now because the Federal Reserve is deciding whether U.S. inflation has cooled enough to avoid another increase in interest rates.

 

Rystad Energy chief economist Claudio Galimberti told Reuters last week that high diesel prices affect virtually every part of the economy and that expectations of continued inflation were one reason U.S. government bond yields had remained elevated.

 

That creates an unusual transmission mechanism for gold. Geopolitical escalation increases safe-haven demand. But the same escalation can raise oil prices, strengthen inflation concerns and make tighter monetary policy more plausible.

 

 

Friday’s jobs report strengthened the rate-hike argument

 

The pressure from oil is arriving immediately after a surprisingly strong U.S. employment report.

 

The U.S. economy added 162,000 jobs in August, well above the 56,000 increase economists surveyed by Reuters had expected. Meanwhile, unemployment remained at 4.1%, and earlier payroll estimates were revised higher.

 

This stronger report increased the market-implied probability of a Federal Reserve rate increase at the September 15-16 meeting.

 

The reaction matters for gold because higher interest rates increase the opportunity cost of holding an asset that pays no interest. Expectations of tighter policy can also push Treasury yields higher.

 

GoldRates examined the immediate payroll reaction in our recent coverage of how strong U.S. employment data revived September Fed rate-hike expectations. The latest Middle East escalation has not displaced that monetary-policy story. It has potentially reinforced it through the inflation channel.

 

 

The dollar is not providing a simple explanation either

 

Normally, a stronger dollar would provide another straightforward reason for falling gold. Monday’s currency market, however, makes the picture more interesting.

 

Higher Fed rate-hike expectations provided relatively little support to the U.S. dollar. Reuters reported that the euro strengthened modestly and the Japanese yen also gained against the dollar.

 

Concerns about U.S. debt, policy uncertainty and the possibility of monetary tightening by other major central banks are limiting the dollar’s response.

 

That suggests gold’s weakness cannot be explained simply by a surging dollar. The more direct pressure is coming from the prospect that U.S. interest rates and bond yields may need to stay higher.

 

 

This is why ‘war equals higher gold’ is too simple

 

The current market provides a useful reminder that gold does not trade on a single rule.

 

A geopolitical crisis can be supportive when investors primarily interpret it as a threat to financial stability. The same crisis can become negative when markets focus instead on inflation and the monetary-policy response.

 

The distinction becomes especially important when the conflict threatens energy supply.

 

The chain currently confronting investors looks something like this. Escalating U.S.-Iran conflict increases risk around Hormuz, while reduced shipping and tanker attacks lift oil prices. Higher energy prices then increase inflation concerns. That makes a Fed rate increase more plausible, while higher expected rates and bond yields reduce the appeal of non-yielding gold.

 

Safe-haven demand has not disappeared. It is simply competing with a powerful monetary-policy effect.

 

 

The next U.S. inflation readings could decide which force wins

 

The next major test for gold is therefore not necessarily another military headline. It is U.S. inflation data.

 

Markets are awaiting the Producer Price Index and Consumer Price Index later this week. Reuters says investors increasingly see those releases as crucial to whether the Federal Reserve raises rates at its September meeting.

 

The setup is unusually important because Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said last week that he would be inclined to leave rates unchanged if incoming inflation data confirm that disinflation is continuing. But he also made clear that a hot inflation reading could justify another increase.

 

That means the employment side of the argument has already strengthened the case for tightening. Inflation now has the opportunity either to confirm it or undermine it.

 

If inflation surprises higher while Brent remains close to $100, markets could become more confident that another Fed increase is coming. That would keep pressure on gold even if geopolitical tensions remain elevated.

 

If inflation continues to cool despite expensive energy, the argument for patience could regain strength, potentially reducing pressure from yields and giving safe-haven demand more room to influence bullion prices.

 

 

What GoldRates readers should watch

 

The most useful way to follow the market over the next several sessions is to watch gold alongside oil, Treasury yields, and Fed expectations rather than treating geopolitical headlines in isolation.

 

GoldRates live gold prices show how the international bullion price is moving across major currencies, while our methodology explains how price momentum is separated from broader market conditions such as yields, the dollar, inflation expectations, and volatility.

 

That distinction is particularly valuable in a market like this one. The geopolitical backdrop looks supportive for gold when viewed alone. The monetary backdrop looks considerably less supportive.

 

The price is reflecting the competition between the two.

 

 

The bigger picture

 

Direct attacks on oil tankers, restricted shipping through Hormuz, and Brent crude above $97 would ordinarily appear to create an ideal environment for a safe-haven rally. Gold’s decline below $4,410 shows why that assumption can fail.

 

The market is currently treating the conflict not only as a source of uncertainty but as a source of inflation.

 

That distinction changes everything. If higher energy prices make another Federal Reserve rate increase more likely, the resulting pressure from yields can offset some of the defensive demand that war would normally create for bullion.

 

For now, gold is caught between those forces. The next U.S. inflation readings may determine which one becomes dominant.

 

 

GoldRates provides market information and educational context for general informational purposes. Nothing in this article should be considered financial or investment advice. Market reference prices can differ from retail prices and may change rapidly.