Venezuela Could Move Four Billion Dollars of Gold to New York After a Seven Year Dispute

A proposed agreement would move Venezuela’s disputed bullion from the Bank of England to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where it could support tightly controlled borrowing rather than an outright sale.

Venezuela is nearing an agreement that could relocate approximately US$4 billion of disputed gold reserves from London to New York. The deal could bring one of the world’s most closely watched sovereign-bullion disputes closer to a resolution.

According to the Financial Times, Venezuela’s interim government and opposition are discussing a US-backed arrangement. Under the proposal, the Bank of England would transfer the gold to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The parties have not completed the transfer yet. They are reportedly nearing an agreement, but important legal and governance details remain unresolved.

Under the proposed structure, the government led by Delcy Rodriguez would gain legal control over the gold but could not sell it outright. Instead, Venezuela could use the bullion as collateral for borrowing. The government could potentially direct the funds towards reconstruction after the country’s devastating June earthquakes.

—

The gold would move but it would not be freely available

The distinction between controlling gold, storing gold and selling gold is central to the story.

A transfer to New York would change the institution holding the bullion. It would not necessarily give Venezuelan authorities unrestricted access to the metal or its full cash value. The proposed safeguards would allow financing against the reserve while restricting outright sales. They would also limit how authorities could use the proceeds.

In practical terms, the gold could support a loan in the same way that another high-value asset can support borrowing. The lender would have security against the bullion, while Venezuela could obtain funding without immediately liquidating the reserve.

Negotiators have not publicly finalised the loan structure, permitted uses of the money or oversight arrangements. They also have not disclosed what would happen in the event of a default. These details will determine how much economic value Venezuela can obtain and how effectively the parties can enforce the restrictions.

—

Why has the gold been stuck in London

The dispute dates to 2019, when the United Kingdom and several other Western governments recognised opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela’s interim president rather than Nicolas Maduro.

That created competing claims over who had the authority to direct Venezuela’s central-bank assets in Britain. The dispute then moved through the UK courts. As a result, the Maduro-appointed board of Venezuela’s central bank could not access the bullion.

By August 2026, Reuters reported that the Bank of England still held approximately 31 tonnes of Venezuelan gold amid the dispute. Venezuela was seeking access to overseas assets for reconstruction.

The proposed agreement would attempt to move beyond the question of which political faction receives direct possession. A controlled transfer to another major central-bank custodian could create a framework acceptable to both the interim government and the opposition.

—

Why New York is being considered

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is one of the world’s most important official gold custodians. Storing the bullion there would keep it within a recognised central-bank vaulting system. It would also place the asset under a structure shaped by US-backed negotiations.

That does not mean the United States would own the gold. Custody identifies where an institution holds and safeguards an asset. Ownership and legal control are separate matters. The proposed restrictions would determine who could issue instructions and for what purposes.

For central banks, location matters because they can often mobilise bullion stored in major financial centres more easily. However, storing reserves abroad can also expose them to foreign court decisions, sanctions and disputes over government recognition.

GoldRates has previously explained why countries hold bullion as part of their reserves in Why Central Banks Buy Gold. Venezuela’s case adds another dimension: a reserve can retain substantial value while becoming practically inaccessible when control over it is disputed.

—

A reserve asset could become reconstruction finance

Using the gold as collateral could give Venezuela access to funding without adding the bullion to the open market. That is important because a collateral arrangement and a gold sale have different consequences.

An outright sale would transfer ownership of the metal to buyers and could create additional market supply. A secured loan would leave the gold in reserve unless the borrower failed to meet the agreed terms and the collateral became enforceable.

The proposal therefore should not be interpreted as an immediate US$4 billion gold sale or as bullion about to enter commercial circulation. Its first effect would be financial and political: converting a frozen reserve into potential borrowing capacity.

The Financial Times reported that opposition representatives are seeking strict controls over the use of any funding. That issue is likely to remain central because the long-running dispute has never been only about where the bars sit. It has also been about who can direct the asset and whether the proceeds can be protected from misuse.

—

This is different from Venezuela’s new mine agreement

The proposed reserve transfer follows another major Venezuelan gold announcement, but the two developments concern different parts of the market.

On September 16, Venezuelan authorities granted Heeney Capital and Mercuria long-term operating and export rights over the Choco mine. GoldRates examined that agreement in A US Investor Just Secured 30-Year Rights to a Major Venezuelan Gold Mine.

The mine agreement concerns future production and the possible return of Venezuelan gold to formal export channels. The reserve proposal concerns existing sovereign bullion that has already been mined and stored abroad.

Taken together, the developments show Venezuela trying to unlock value from both sides of its gold position: future mineral production inside the country and financial reserves held outside it. Neither development guarantees immediate revenue. The mine requires investment and sustained production, while the reserve transfer still needs a final agreement and enforceable controls.

—

Would the transfer affect the gold price?

The direct effect on the international gold price is likely to be limited if the bullion remains in official custody and is used only as collateral.

Thirty-one tonnes is a substantial national asset, but a transfer between two central-bank vaults does not automatically create new market supply. The metal already exists, and changing its location does not alter global above-ground stocks.

The market implications would become more relevant if the final agreement allowed sales, if collateral enforcement could place bullion on the market, or if the arrangement encouraged other governments to reconsider where their reserves are held.

For current bullion prices and broader market conditions, readers can follow GoldRates live gold prices.

—

What happens next

The next milestone is a final agreement supported by the Venezuelan government and opposition. Any arrangement would also need to address the existing UK legal proceedings and establish the authority required for the Bank of England to release the bullion.

The most important details will be the destination and custody terms, restrictions on sale, the identity of any lender, the permitted use of borrowed funds, independent oversight, and the safeguards applied if political conditions change.

Until those points are settled and the bullion is actually transferred, the accurate description is that Venezuela may move its gold to New York. It has not done so yet.

—

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. The proposed agreement has not been finalised, and its terms, legal status and implementation may change.